I recently listened to two interviews which were full of life and which I want to mention here.
Both were hosted by NPR’s Tom Ashbrook, one was with Eve Ensler and the other with Philip Hoare. First Eve.
Eve was the originator of The Vagina Monologues which sets out (my experience) to make public some of the experiences which girls/women have had and which are either taboo or simply difficult to express. Experiences such as rape, incest, domestic and other forms of violence, female genital mutilation (violence), and orgasms, and taboo issues such as how young girls see their bodies (obesity, anorexia), and to their genitalia, how girls relate to pleasure, relate to sex, … and on and on and on. I guess The Vagina Monologues basically encourage women to speak out about their situations by letting them now they are not alone, not the only ones facing those issues. It does so by having performances, on stage, of women reading a huge variety of monologues.
In regards to the interview (which you can find here). In general I was very moved. Moved by the excerpts she read from her new book, by the stories she shared, by her motivation to the cause. I have watched the performance at the University of Florida and was very impressed by how much passion was in the readings and how much the whole public (men and women) ressonated with the stories, I think that helped me to connect better to Eve when listening to the interview. Tom Ashbrook is my favorite interviewer at the moment. I liked how he allotted plenty of time for Eve to read from the book.
I have to say, though, that I was surprised, even stunned, by his words at one or two points; it seemed he was … rude to his guest. In particular there was one man who called in and asked something of Eve that she was unable to respond to, and Tom said: “I thought you’d be more empathetic than that Eve” and then right afterwards: “I thought you had a lot of capacity on that score”.
I just want to go a little further here. Overall the interview really worked for me but from here onwards I feel the interaction suffered some shift and didn’t return.
The caller started his comment by saying: “I just want to ask the author is there a way you can kind of temper your enthusiasm for emotion because I’ve been in two relationships, I’ve been married twice, my first relationship, which didn’t work out that well, my former wife used emotion as a trump card to you know play and say that emotion was more important than what actually occurred. My second wife…”
Eve wasn’t sure what to respond, saying that she didn’t fully understand the caller and that it is hard to respond because she wasn’t there (in the caller’s interactions with his wives). To which Tom said those above comments. I have to say I agree with Eve; is the caller really asking Eve to be change how enthusiastic she is about emotion because the caller had an experience he wasn’t pleased with?! I imagine the caller simply wants Eve to acknowledge that the card “emotion” can be used as verbal violence in a relationship. He isn’t going to get that acknowledgment by asking the author, or anyone, to temper her enthusiasm.
Overall, I applaud both Eve and Tom for broadcasting these ideas to the world.


